Accessibility conformance

VPAT 2.5 Accessibility Conformance Report

Version 1.0 · Effective July 27, 2026 · Re-issued at launch

Name of product: Career Readiness Report public website (careerreadinessreport.com) Report date: July 27, 2026 Report version: 1.0 Contact: [email protected] Vendor: Champlin Enterprises, LLC, Illinois, United States VPAT version used: VPAT 2.5 INT (November 2023), the edition covering WCAG, Revised Section 508 and EN 301 549 in a single report.

Scope of this report, read before the tables

This ACR covers the public website at careerreadinessreport.com as it exists on the report date. It does not cover the assessment application, which launches August 15, 2026 with capabilities rolling out on a published roadmap from there.

We are drawing that line explicitly because the alternative is worse. Publishing an ACR for software that does not yet exist would mean asserting tested conformance for interfaces nobody has tested, and an accessibility coordinator relying on it would be relying on fiction. An ACR covering the application is issued against the running product once its interfaces exist, and will supersede this one.

What this report is good for today: it shows the standard we build to, the methods we test with, and the specific criteria we already meet on a real shipped interface.

Applicable standards and guidelines

StandardIncluded in this report
WCAG 2.2 Level AYes
WCAG 2.2 Level AAYes
WCAG 2.2 Level AAANo, not evaluated
Revised Section 508 (36 CFR Part 1194, Appendices A, B, C)Yes
EN 301 549 v3.2.1Yes

Terms used

  • Supports. The functionality of the product has at least one method that meets the

criterion without known defects, or meets it with equivalent facilitation.

  • Partially Supports. Some functionality does not meet the criterion.
  • Does Not Support. The majority of functionality does not meet the criterion.
  • Not Applicable. The criterion is not relevant to the product.

Evaluation methods

  • Automated: Lighthouse accessibility audits run against the live site on every deploy.

Current score 100.

  • Automated: axe-core rule set.
  • Manual: keyboard-only traversal of every page and interactive element, including the

launch-notification form.

  • Manual: screen reader spot checks with VoiceOver on macOS and Safari.
  • Manual: 400% zoom and 320 CSS pixel reflow checks.
  • Manual: contrast ratio verification of every text and background pairing against the

design tokens.

We have not commissioned a third-party accessibility audit, and we have not conducted usability testing with assistive-technology users. Both are stated as limitations rather than omitted.

---

Table 1: Success Criteria, Level A

CriterionConformanceRemarks
1.1.1 Non-text ContentSupportsAll informative images carry descriptive alt text; decorative images use alt="". Icons are inline SVG marked aria-hidden with adjacent text labels.
1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)Not ApplicableNo audio or video content.
1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)Not ApplicableNo audio or video content.
1.2.3 Audio Description or Media AlternativeNot ApplicableNo audio or video content.
1.3.1 Info and RelationshipsSupportsSemantic HTML throughout: landmarks, h1-h3 hierarchy with no skipped levels, ul role="list", real table markup with header cells, labels bound to inputs.
1.3.2 Meaningful SequenceSupportsDOM order matches visual order; no CSS reordering that changes reading sequence.
1.3.3 Sensory CharacteristicsSupportsNo instruction depends on shape, size or position alone.
1.4.1 Use of ColorSupportsColor is never the sole means of conveying information. Links are underlined or otherwise distinguished in body copy.
1.4.2 Audio ControlNot ApplicableNo auto-playing audio.
2.1.1 KeyboardSupportsAll interactive elements are reachable and operable by keyboard. The site uses native controls.
2.1.2 No Keyboard TrapSupportsNo component traps focus.
2.1.4 Character Key ShortcutsNot ApplicableNo single-character key shortcuts implemented.
2.2.1 Timing AdjustableNot ApplicableNo time limits.
2.2.2 Pause, Stop, HideSupportsNo auto-updating or moving content. Scroll-reveal animations are decorative, run once, and are disabled under prefers-reduced-motion.
2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below ThresholdSupportsNo flashing content.
2.4.1 Bypass BlocksSupportsSkip link to main content, plus ARIA landmarks.
2.4.2 Page TitledSupportsEvery page has a unique, descriptive title.
2.4.3 Focus OrderSupportsFocus order follows a logical reading sequence.
2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)SupportsLink text is descriptive; no bare "click here" or "read more".
2.5.1 Pointer GesturesNot ApplicableNo multipoint or path-based gestures.
2.5.2 Pointer CancellationSupportsActivation occurs on the up-event via native controls.
2.5.3 Label in NameSupportsAccessible names contain the visible label text.
2.5.4 Motion ActuationNot ApplicableNo motion-actuated functionality.
3.1.1 Language of PageSupportslang="en" on the root element.
3.2.1 On FocusSupportsFocus does not trigger a change of context.
3.2.2 On InputSupportsNo automatic context change on input. The notification form submits only on explicit activation.
3.2.6 Consistent Help (WCAG 2.2)SupportsContact routes appear in the footer in the same location on every page.
3.3.1 Error IdentificationSupportsForm errors are identified in text and announced via a live region.
3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsSupportsEvery input has a persistent visible label. The honeypot field is hidden from assistive technology and excluded from the tab order.
3.3.7 Redundant Entry (WCAG 2.2)Not ApplicableSingle-step form; no information is requested twice.
4.1.2 Name, Role, ValueSupportsNative elements throughout; ARIA used only where native semantics are insufficient.

WCAG 2.2 removed 4.1.1 Parsing, so it is not reported.

---

Table 2: Success Criteria, Level AA

CriterionConformanceRemarks
1.2.4 Captions (Live)Not ApplicableNo live media.
1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)Not ApplicableNo video content.
1.3.4 OrientationSupportsLayout works in both portrait and landscape; no orientation lock.
1.3.5 Identify Input PurposeSupportsThe email input uses type="email" with autocomplete="email".
1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)SupportsAll text pairings verified. The lowest ratio in the system is 5.00:1 (muted text on the footer tint) against a 4.5:1 requirement. Body text is well above.
1.4.4 Resize TextSupportsText scales to 200% without loss of content or function; layout uses relative units.
1.4.5 Images of TextSupportsNo images of text except the logo wordmark, which is exempt as a logotype.
1.4.10 ReflowSupportsNo horizontal scrolling at 320 CSS pixels. Wide tables scroll within their own container rather than forcing the page to scroll.
1.4.11 Non-text ContrastSupportsInteractive component boundaries and focus indicators meet 3:1 against adjacent colors.
1.4.12 Text SpacingSupportsNo loss of content when spacing overrides are applied.
1.4.13 Content on Hover or FocusNot ApplicableNo hover or focus-triggered additional content.
2.4.5 Multiple WaysSupportsFooter navigation, in-page links, an XML sitemap and an RSS feed.
2.4.6 Headings and LabelsSupportsHeadings and labels describe topic or purpose.
2.4.7 Focus VisibleSupportsA visible focus ring is present on all focusable elements; the browser default is enhanced, never removed.
2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) (WCAG 2.2)SupportsNo sticky element obscures a focused control.
2.5.7 Dragging Movements (WCAG 2.2)Not ApplicableNo dragging operations.
2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) (WCAG 2.2)SupportsInteractive targets meet or exceed 24 by 24 CSS pixels.
3.1.2 Language of PartsNot ApplicableAll content is in English.
3.2.3 Consistent NavigationSupportsNavigation appears in the same relative order on every page.
3.2.4 Consistent IdentificationSupportsComponents with the same function are labeled consistently.
3.3.3 Error SuggestionSupportsValidation messages describe how to correct the input.
3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)Not ApplicableNo legal, financial or data-modifying transactions on the public site.
3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum) (WCAG 2.2)Not ApplicableNo authentication on the public site. Noted as in scope for the application ACR, where the planned answer is that authentication requires no cognitive function test and supports password managers and campus SSO.

---

Revised Section 508 Report

Chapter 3, Functional Performance Criteria

CriterionConformanceRemarks
302.1 Without VisionSupportsFull screen-reader operability; all content available as text.
302.2 With Limited VisionSupportsZoom to 200% and reflow at 320px both supported; contrast exceeds minimums.
302.3 Without Perception of ColorSupportsNo information conveyed by color alone.
302.4 Without HearingNot ApplicableNo audio content.
302.5 With Limited HearingNot ApplicableNo audio content.
302.6 Without SpeechNot ApplicableNo speech input required.
302.7 With Limited ManipulationSupportsFull keyboard operability; targets meet 24px minimum; no dragging.
302.8 With Limited Reach and StrengthSupportsNo operation requires simultaneous actions or sustained input.
302.9 With Limited Language, Cognitive, and Learning AbilitiesSupportsPlain language, consistent structure, reduced-motion support, no time limits.

Chapter 4, Hardware. Not Applicable. The product is web software with no hardware component.

Chapter 5, Software. 501.1 applies through the WCAG tables above. The product is a web application accessed in a standard browser and exposes no platform accessibility services of its own.

Chapter 6, Support Documentation and Services. Supports. Documentation is published as accessible HTML on this site rather than as untagged PDF. Support is provided by email at [email protected], which imposes no requirement to use speech or hearing.

---

EN 301 549 v3.2.1

ChapterConformanceRemarks
4.2 Functional performanceSupportsSee Chapter 3 table above.
5 Generic requirementsPartially ApplicableClosed-functionality requirements do not apply to browser-based software.
6 ICT with two-way voice communicationNot ApplicableNo voice communication.
7 ICT with video capabilitiesNot ApplicableNo video.
8 HardwareNot ApplicableNo hardware.
9 WebSupportsWCAG 2.2 AA per the tables above, which exceeds the WCAG 2.1 AA baseline EN 301 549 references.
10 Non-web documentsSupportsDocumentation is HTML, not PDF.
11 SoftwareNot ApplicableNo non-web software component.
12 Documentation and support servicesSupportsAccessible HTML documentation and an email support channel.
13 ICT providing relay or emergency service accessNot ApplicableNot a relay or emergency service.

---

Known limitations and roadmap

  1. The application is not covered. The ACR for the assessment platform is issued

against the running product as its interfaces ship. See the roadmap.

  1. No third-party audit. All findings here are from our own automated and manual

testing.

  1. No assistive-technology user testing. We have tested with screen readers; we have

not run sessions with people who use them daily. That is the difference between technical conformance and usability, and we do not want to blur it.

  1. Screen reader coverage is narrow. VoiceOver on Safari has been exercised

thoroughly; JAWS and NVDA have not been part of routine testing.

Reporting a barrier

Email [email protected]. We acknowledge within two business days and give you a remediation plan even when the fix will take longer. If a barrier blocks a student from completing an assessment, tell us that in the subject line and we will treat it with the urgency of a production outage.